He points to a paragraph from the ruling, which states: “In my view, the criticisms point to two conceptual challenges to achieving a consistent application of a prohibition against hate speech. Lucas Lung, a partner at Lerners LLP, says an important point of the ruling is even though freedom of expression was the focal point, one shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that there is an important equality right being protected here. “The expression portrays the targeted group as a menace that threatens the safety and well-being of others, makes reference to respected sources in an effort to lend credibility to the negative generalizations, and uses vilifying and derogatory representations to create a tone of hatred.” Passages of these flyers combine many of the hallmarks of hatred identified in the case law,” Justice Marshall Rothstein wrote on behalf of the court. “The tribunal’s conclusions with respect to the first two flyers were reasonable. In its 6-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two of the flyers constituted hate speech, thereby reinstating Whatcott’s conviction by the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal. The first two flyers were entitled “Keep Homosexuality out of Saskatoon’s Public Schools!” and “Sodomites in our Public Schools.” The other two flyers were identical to each other and were a reprint of a page of classified advertisements to which handwritten comments were added, according to the ruling. Four people complained to the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, which then sued Whatcott.
![i hate you because your gay meme i hate you because your gay meme](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/33/bc/d0/33bcd001b6259877b2972e54491263e0.jpg)
![i hate you because your gay meme i hate you because your gay meme](https://cdn.dopl3r.com/media/memes_files/if-your-mom-hates-your-haircut-you-have-a-fantastic-haircut-ZCqUC.jpg)
Whatcott, ( /mus36t) involves William Whatcott, a Saskatchewan man who distributed, in 20, four flyers against homosexuality. The case, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v.
#I hate you because your gay meme code#
The top court pared down the law, ruling that an expression that “ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity of,” as the Saskatchewan code sets out, “does not rise to the level of ardent and extreme feelings constituting hatred.” That part of Saskatchewan’s law goes too far and was ruled unconstitutional. Anti-gay activist William Whatcott talks on his phone during a break in hearings at the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa October 12, 2011.